JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 19, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Balduino Jose Almario Hoyos

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Presidente De La Republica
  • Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
  • Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó inaplicar en el presente caso el numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por inconstitucional.

Con base en lo anterior, se resolverá el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado 33 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá y el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, en el sentido de adscribir al Juzgado 33 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá el conocimiento de la tutela instaurada por el ciudadano de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. En el presente caso INAPLICAR por inconstitucional el numeral 1o del articulo 1o del decreto 1382 de 2000. En consecuencia DECIDIR la colision de competencias suscitada entre el Juzgado 33 Penal del Circuito de Bogota y el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, en el sentido de adscribir al Juzgado 33 Penal del Circuito de Bogota el conocimiento de la tutela instaurada por el senor BALDUINO JOSE ALMARIO HOYOS.
  2. Por Secretaria remitase el expediente al referido Juzgado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.